Since 2014, the marshall project has been curating some of the best criminal justice reporting from around the. Historically, the manual method was the only method known for generating overlays and was used first in about 1966. Rakhee modak 1, sandhya tamgadge 2, amit mhapuskar 1, manjula hebbale 1, n vasantha vijayarabhavan 1 1 department of oral medicine and radiology, bharati vidyapeeth deemed university dental college and hospital, pune, india 2 department of oral and maxillofacial pathology and microbiology, d. The movement of a persons jaw and tongue when he or she. Incredibly, prosecutors are still defending bite mark. Having importance in biometrics as well as in forensics the precise matching of. Rakhee modak 1, sandhya tamgadge 2, amit mhapuskar 1, manjula hebbale 1, n vasantha vijayarabhavan 1 1 department of oral medicine and radiology, bharati. Bitemark analysis is extremely complex, with many factors involved in a forensic dentists ability to determine the identity of the perpetrator. Kouble and craig compared direct methods and indirect methods of bite mark analysis.
Golden forensic odontology is the branch of dentistry that deals with the collection, evaluation, and proper handling of dental evidence to assist law. Some of these methods include bite mark analysis, labeling of dental prosthesis dentures, rugoscopy palatal rugae which are located on. Bite mark evidence used to convict pennsylvania man of rape. Bite mark management and analysis master of forensic odontology. The two applied techniques are similar in accuracy for bite mark analysis. Comparative study on two methods for bite mark analysis. Although bite marks of an individual do have uniqueness due to specific characteristics and arrangement of the teeth, when it comes to bite mark analysis, it is. In fact, the entire section on bite mark analysis is an extended argument explaining why it isnt recommended. Bite mark analysis is an imperative area of forensic odontology and considered the commonest form of dental evidence presented in. Giannelli in criminal trials, forensic dentistry typically is used in two ways. Published on mar 6, 2017 this project has been created with explain everything interactive whiteboard for windows. Having importance in biometrics as well as in forensics the precise matching of patterns in a bite marks is a critical area of research are one of the most frequent form of human abuse and hence their analysis is the most demanding and complicated part of forensic. Others say that its acceptable to state there is a probability that a suspect created the mark, but that.
Apr 19, 2016 overlay fabrication in bite mark analysis. Bite mark evidence, an aspect of forensic odontology, is the process by which odontologists dentists attempt to match marks found at crime scenes with the dental impressions of suspects. Examine the pattern to determine if it is a bitemark. He rose to prominence in the 1980s as a selfproclaimed forensic dentistry expert, despite having no formal. Although bite marks of an individual do have uniqueness due to specific characteristics and. In the past, the direct method compared a model of the suspects teeth to a lifesize photograph of the actual bite mark. The principle of bite mark analysis is based on the premise that no two people have similar teeth, and hence the bite marks made are also dissimilar. Literature reveals various methods for bite mark analysis such as manual, radiographic, and computedassisted by different authors. The movement of a persons jaw and tongue when he or she bites contributes to the type of mark that is left. Bite mark analysis is most commonly used in criminal rape, murder and child abuse cases. These are very different procedures, and the failure to distinguish. I was interested to know about the role of dental professionals in forensic team and how dental findings can serve the justice system.
Report to the president forensic science in criminal courts. The results of this study showed that the computerbased method for bite mark analysis was as accurate as the docking procedure in cases with bite marks in an apple and may be useful in a variety. Patil university, school of dentistry, navi mumbai. Following is a discussion of the difference between bite mark analysis and comparison of a bite mark to a suspects dentition for purposes of identification. For lots more information about forensic dentistry and crime stuff, check out the articles and links below.
The issues within the bite mark analysis are discussed in this paper. Now some critics feel that bitemark analysis should be used only to eliminate, not to identify, a suspect. Bitemark analysis is conducted by forensic dentists and relies on two foundational premises. A novel computerassisted method of bite mark analysis for gender. Irrespective of the method used, bitemark analysis include registration. West practices general dentistry in hattiesburg, miss. The marks left by the teeth in a person may be used to identify an individual. However the advent of dna and its recovery from bite marks has offered an objective method of bite mark analysis. Distance tooth 6 to tooth 10 tooth 6 to tooth 10 44. The methods of wax impression were better for producing. A bite mark is a mark created by teeth either alone or in the combination with other oral structures 2,3. I have written master thesis about different methods in bitemark analysis. Who is michael west, bite marks expert on the innocence files.
Aug 21, 2012 bite mark analysis and comparison using imageperception technology j forensic odontostomatol 2006. It also sometimes comes into play in child custody disputes. Bitemark analysis is used widely in the judicial system to establish a connection between the suspect and a crime. Analytical methods are so widespread in science that the term analysis often serves as a synonym for research in general, both in the natural and social sciencesfor example, quantitative and qualitative.
Bite marks are thus, considered as valuable alternative to fingerprinting and dna identification in forensic examinations. Cases where dna revealed that bite mark analysis led to. Who is michael west, bite marks expert on the innocence. Similar to fingerprint analysis, the assumption behind bite mark comparisons that every persons dental characteristics are unique has not been adequately scientifically studied or scrutinized. In 1991, john kunco was convicted in pennsylvania of raping and torturing a 55yearold woman who lived at the apartment building where hed previously been a maintenance worker. Forensic dentist training as well as proper education of the jury are also factors. Which is odd, because there is exactly zero proof that bitemarks. Now some critics feel that bite mark analysis should be used only to eliminate, not to identify, a suspect. A comparative study of overlay generation methods in bite.
Some of these methods include bite mark analysis, labeling of dental prosthesis dentures, rugoscopy palatal rugae which are located on the roof of the mouth, and cheiloscopy lip prints 1. Golden forensic odontology is the branch of dentistry that deals with the collection, evaluation, and proper handling of dental evidence to assist law enforcement as well as civil and criminal judicial proceedings. Issues in human and animal bite mark bitemark analysis. As with other experiencebased forensic methods, forensic odontology suffers from the potential for large bias among bite mark experts in evaluating a specific bite mark in cases in. Accuracy of bite mark analysis from food substances. The methods of wax impression were better for producing overlay of tooth away from the occlusal plane. Bite site evidence general considerations the forensic odontologist is often not involved in the initial examination and collection of the bitemark evidence. Bite mark analysis includes description of bite marks, bite mark recognition, bite mark registration, evidence collection on suspects, scanning bite mark photographs, detecting and. Morris was a neighbor to the little girl who was found stabbed, sexually. Using scientific methodology, the examination of bitemark evidence can be divided into four basic steps. Bitemark evidence a curated collection of links the record what are records.
The odontologist who aided in youngs conviction later said that the prosecution pushed him to exaggerate his results. Xerographic method was the most accurate of the four techniques, with the highest reproducibility for bite mark analysis. The position of the body at the time the bite was inflicted may also play a part. He rose to prominence in the 1980s as a selfproclaimed forensic dentistry expert, despite having no formal training in forensic science, based on bite mark analysis techniques he claimed to have invented and which could not be conducted by anyone else. A novel computerassisted method of bite mark analysis for. The first step in analyzing the bite is to identify it as human. The differences in size and shape of teeth can sometimes be easily noticed especially when teeth are missing or prominent 29. Reliability of intercanine distance while analysing bite mark using metric method. Alreshaid, rameswari poornima j riyadh elm university, college of d received 31 january 2019. As for the fields methods of collecting and recording bite marks, its true. Anthony cardoza, who coauthored a 1999 study showing that bite mark analysis could be reliable under specific conditions, admitted, the best bite mark is one you can swab for dna source. Impressions of both, maxillary as well as mandibular. A human bite mark is usually described as an elliptical. Bite mark analysis is an imperative area of forensic odontology and considered the commonest form of dental evidence presented in the criminal court.
According to pretty and turnbull, the central dogma of bite mark analysis is based on two assumptions. While the methods behind collecting bite mark evidence at the scene are leading toward greater standardization, the methodology behind analyzing bite marks is. Bite mark analysis article about bite mark analysis by. Bitemark analysis howstuffworks science howstuffworks. Bitemark analysis have a significant role in forensic dentistry. Analysis and identification of bite marks in forensic casework. For heinous crimes homicide, sexual assault, child abuse bitemark analysis has been a standby for forensic detectives. Human bite mark analysis is by far the most demanding and complicated part of forensic dentistry. The aims of this study are to evaluate the accuracy of two methods for bite mark analysis overlay and docking techniques on three different food materials. Bite mark evidence has been introduced in trials all over the country, and sometimes has been the smoking gun leading to a conviction.
Abfo bitemark methodology standards and guid elin s standards. Bite mark analysis and comparison using imageperception technology j forensic odontostomatol 2006. Identification and matching of human bite marks and injuries can give a forensic scientist great value of results. Various techniques are used in bite mark analysis and the choice of technique depends largely on personal preference.
Abfo bitemark methodology standards and guid elin s. Report to the president forensic science in criminal. The study aimed to determine the technique with maximum accuracy in production of bite mark overlay. The national academy of sciences slams bite mark analysis. Council concludes bitemark analysis is junk the intercept. Our study aimed to help close these gaps for a number of forensic featurecomparison. In concluding that more research is needed to confirm the fundamental basis for the science of bite mark comparison, the nas report summarized some of the basic problems inherent in bite mark analysis and interpretation as follows. Our study aimed to help close these gaps for a number of forensic featurecomparison methodsspecifically, methods for comparing dna samples, bitemarks, latent fingerprints, firearm marks, footwear, and hair. Bite mark evidence, an aspect of forensic odontology, is the. Skepticism around bite mark analysis has mounted in recent years in part because of the growing number of wrongful convictions attributable to bite mark evidence. Animal teeth are very different from humans teeth, so they leave very different bitemark patterns.
Bite mark analysis is extremely complex, with many factors involved in a forensic dentists ability to determine the identity of the perpetrator. Intercanine distance and bite marks analysis using metric method. The aims and objectives of the study were to compare the accuracy of bite mark analysis from three different food substancesapple, cheese and chocolate using two techniquesthe. Since 2014, the marshall project has been curating some of the best criminal justice reporting from around the web. Feb 28, 2009 as with other experiencebased forensic methods, forensic odontology suffers from the potential for large bias among bite mark experts in evaluating a specific bite mark in cases in. Upper jaw distance cuspid to cuspid cuspid to cuspid 38mm 42mm bite mark. The uniqueness of the human dentition has not been scientifically established.
This is for a high school level forensic science class. Bite marks can be found in food, flesh, cigars, pipes and musical instruments. A comparative study of trends in human bite mark analysis. In these records you will find the most recent and the most authoritative articles on the topics, people and events that are shaping the criminal justice conversation. In these experiments, direct comparisons were made between dental models and either photographs or fingerprint powder liftmodels. Methods to document human bitemark evidence bitemark, bite mark, bitemark the meaning of the terms is clear and there is no need for the abfo to endorse a particular form. The results of the current study anticipate to serve in investigations of the bite mark evidence.
Jan 30, 2017 in fact, the entire section on bite mark analysis is an extended argument explaining why it isnt recommended. How the flawed science of bite mark analysis has sent. Bite mark management and analysis master of forensic. Irrespective of the method used, bitemark analysis include registration of both the bitemark and the suspect dentition, comparison of the dentition and the bitemark, inspection of similarities and dissimilarities. Bitemark analysis and comparison forensic odontology part ii. Pdf comparative study on two methods for bite mark analysis. Table 1 shows statistics of different grades of identification by four different methods of comparison in maxillary bite mark impressions and mandibular bite mark impressions. Methods to document human bitemark evidence bitemark, bite mark, bite mark the meaning of the terms is clear and there is no need for the abfo to endorse a particular form. Bite mark evidence used to convict pennsylvania man of.
Bitemark analysis is junk, white house says inverse. Historically, the manual method was the only method. Others say that its acceptable to state there is a probability that a suspect created the mark, but that its important to clarify that bite marks cant be the only thing linking the suspect to the crime. Feb, 2015 bite mark analysis is most commonly used in criminal rape, murder and child abuse cases. Sep 07, 2016 bitemark analysis is conducted by forensic dentists and relies on two foundational premises. Bite marks analysis is based on the principle that no two mouths are alike. Apr 17, 2012 similar to fingerprint analysis, the assumption behind bite mark comparisons that every persons dental characteristics are unique has not been adequately scientifically studied or scrutinized. Poster presentation a comparative s analysis methods reem m. Aug 19, 2016 bite mark analysis includes description of bite marks, bite mark recognition, bite mark registration, evidence collection on suspects, scanning bite mark photographs, detecting and correcting photographic distortion, resizing the photograph, printing and enhancing and adding text, scanning suspects casts, overlay fabrication, comparison methods, guidelines on bite mark analysis and management.
787 634 75 471 18 1258 1288 1301 951 707 1543 1399 947 594 1429 1058 487 692 1030 123 1415 1511 1239 1250 516 128 303 493 1192 17 94 507 680 174 67 784 147 218 769 478 214 279 792 1376 753 1353 650 686 431 1197 640